This makes it difficult for us to understand the temptation that visual things are to men. We just don't work that way, and so we advocate that all men need is stronger self control. Men simply need to take custody of their eyes and control of their biology. Why can't men be more like us? After all, we can look at gorgeous men and then go back to discussing important things, like politics or shoes. Lets put it to the test shall we?
![]() |
| My apologies to my male readers. I would have included a picture of a hot girl in order to make my point, but I didn't want you to get stuck here. |
Are you reading again already? What was that? 30 seconds? a minute? Are you like me and your eyes keep darting up there but you can carry on with reading anyway? It's because our brains are wired differently. It can be hard for us to understand the temptation we become when we flash cleavage fore or aft. We just don't look at men the way they look at us.
But we look at pie that way.
We look at food and know what it is to lust after something we see. The soft creamy texture of cheesecake topped with fresh berries
the warm melty gooey-ness of fresh from the oven chocolate chip cookies
delightfully decadent, rich and sinful chocolate cake
Whether it's the creamiest pudding, hot and salty french fries, or a perfectly aged and grilled steak, women can't take their eyes or their minds off of food. It is our temptation and our mistress. We know the truth about why women read cookbooks from cover to cover like a novel. It's food porn.
If there is a plate of something tasty on the table and a fork nearby, I can hardly concentrate on anything else. No mater how interesting the conversation, my mind will wander again and again to the sight of the meringue on the coconut cream pie in all its silken goodness. My resolve will falter, my gaze linger. The thought of sight, smell, texture, taste....all of it, will consume my mind. I will eat bite after savory bite without being conscious of the quantity and to hell with calories and the consequences!
I learned long ago to throw a napkin over it. When the cravings hit me and the doughnuts call my name, the only thing I can do is to remove it from my sight. I have to actually leave or conceal the object of my desire or it will be in my mouth and I won't remember how it got there. The remorse will set in as I lick the last crumbs from the fork, but by then it is too late.
This is how women's bodies are for men. Boobs are the chocolate cake. The small of our backs are the pie. We have to help them out and throw a napkin over it. They're on a diet, ladies. A strict meal plan of just one course. We know how difficult it is to ignore the goodies on the table. We know how hard it is to resist just that one little taste of goodness. We know how hard it can be. Don't we owe them the favor of covering it up and making their self-control a bit easier to manage? The next time you ask someone to take away dessert to help you resist temptation, use it as a reminder to make sure your own goodies are covered up and off the table, too.




24 comments:
Brilliant! Thank you on behalf of good men everywhere!
I thought I was only weird one reading cookbooks cover to cover!!
Excellent point - except for those blasted cravings (food or otherwise). LOL Tea, no, you aren't the only one who reads cookbooks cover to cover.
mmm food p!!! So yummy! I love food!!!!!
Yes. This. I tell my nieces: Would you put a tray of brownies on the coffee table, then get mad at your guests for asking to have some?
And wow, the food pictures. The guy is ho-hum. The food made me start to salivate. Sheesh.
This is, bar none, the BEST explanation for modesty I've ever seen in my life. And I never drew the connection between "food porn" and, well, actual porn.
To quote a famous movie "YES! YES! YES! YES!!!"
Loved it, except I did get a bit hung up on that photo of brownies.
The guy...whatevah. Too muscle-y. Now the cheesecake? I got a little stuck on that one. This might be the best analogy on modesty I've ever heard.
I agree with Shawna; this is the best stated argument for modesty.
I love this explanation!! Thanks for the analogy. I agree with the rest of the comments.
I agree with the analogy... totally disagree with the assertion that women are not sexually attracted visually. That doesn't apply to all women. And your provocative picture is setting out temptation for those women who are visually stimulated.
And, not all women have such a relationship with food.
I don't find that guy attractive at all.
The food made my mouth water, though. lol I guess you're right.
Hi! I don't think I've commented here before. Came here from Leila's status ;)
Anonymous - You're right, of course. Nothing is going to be true for all of any group, but it's true for a whole lot of them. Have you read the other comments? The fact is that women are not men and many don't understand the level of temptation. But they do understand that the cookies in my pantry are calling my name even at 11:00 at night.
That guy doesn't look like he has a personality. The food is another story.
I, also, did not find the guy attractive at all. The food, however, made me salivate. I am an abuser of food porn, I dream about it, I post endlessly on FB about it, I eat, a lot.
Great post! Fantastic food for thought! ;)
Perhaps I'm the only one of your readers that actually find the guy a bit attractive (although I noticed that it's mainly because his face was covered that I even noticed his abs).
The cookies got me. I'm still caught up in the warm aroma...
Good post. I like the comparison. I've always encouraged my daughters to dress modestly.
Hmm, I do admire men in hats. It's not the muscles at all, for me. LOL
I don't know, while the food looked yummy... the dude looked yummier. But that's just me. I've heard Dennis Prager theorize similarly about women and their supposed lack of visual attraction. While I do agree that men are probably much, MUCH more visually stimulated and preoccupied with sexual imagery - I don't quite buy the notion that women aren't at all. And I'm not one to stare longingly at food. Unless I haven't eaten in quite some time... in which case no amount of napkins is going to help.
I LOVE THIS!!!
♥ ♥ ♥
Excellent analogy!! Love it. Food looks great!!!
My goodnes!! The typos in my comment (can I blame it on the two snack breaks?)
I deleted and tried it again! Here goes:
I'm torn. I get the point but I still don't think we would blame a man if he brought over a delicious chocolate pie (with whipped cream and dark chocolate shavings with an oreo cookie crumb crust...or something) and I ate all of it. My gluttony would be my fault not the person who made the pie.
I'm really modesty apathetic I think. Well that's a lie, I'm for modesty just not for the sake of men. I'm more for modesty for the sake of glorifying our God given beauty. Cleavage to our belly buttons and thongs showing doesn't say "Respect my innate dignity." they say: "Looks at my ass."
Full disclosure: I had to take two snack breaks while reading and writing this. Damnit food pictures! :)
So why do unattractive women have to put a napkin on it? No, there has to be more the the modesty thing.
And women are visually stimulated. That is the whole reason I try not to flaunt my wealth and success around the poor dears lest they fall into sin. :-)
Post a Comment